Jrs Canis(C4LN2), PX40
Observation period : 2013/7/31 to 2013/8/10

This page shows results for the PX40 line based on monitoring by the Jrs Canis and comparison with the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP.

Overall statistics

Number of profilesNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
17758854-0.021.3111.67-6.78

Abbreviations in the table indicate:
AVE: average difference (observation value minus assimilation value)
RMSD: root mean square of difference
MAXD: maximum difference
MIND: minimum difference



Statistics for each depth range

Depth rangeNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
0-504412-0.471.073.23-6.78
50-1004400-0.410.963.66-5.49
100-1504400-0.400.992.92-4.97
150-2004400-0.361.103.21-5.51
200-2504400-0.251.194.90-5.99
250-3004400-0.151.316.30-6.16
300-3504400-0.061.367.32-6.32
350-40044000.051.348.26-6.16
400-45044000.121.358.90-5.69
450-50044000.270.869.47-4.70
500-55017600.391.3910.08-3.58
550-60017600.451.4010.58-2.62
600-65017600.451.3710.91-1.92
650-70017520.431.3511.13-1.64
700-75017500.411.3211.22-1.14
750-80017500.321.3311.28-5.39
800-85017500.321.3711.40-5.09
850-90017190.341.3311.53-3.69
900-9507850.601.8711.61-2.36
950-1000516.581.3111.660.30


Results of QC

A total of 177 profiles (80625 data, reported by BATHY or TESAC) were received from the Jrs Canis.
The results of JMA quality control are as follows.
  • Grounded test
  • Error data: 0 of 80625

  • Position on land test
  • On land: 0 of 177

    Invalid position: 0 of 177

  • Regional range test
  • Error data (low): 4 of 80625

    Error data (high): 20 of 80625

  • Gradient test
  • Error data: 274 of 80625

For datails of JMA's quality control procedures, please refer to this page.


Summary of QC

  • Some erroneous profiles are detected by JMA's automated quality control procedures. These are checked by the regional range test and the gradient test. The main cause will be "hitting bottom" of XBT.
  • Among the data that passed JMA's automated quality control procedures, some "hitting bottom" data are found in the seas near the Boso Peninsula and adjacent Hawaii Islands (Refer to concerned figures (A) and (B)). The topography used our grounded test is too rough to catch the error.
  • Two of the observations around 30.7°N, 156°E are considered to be erroneous data (Refer to concerned figures (C)).
  • With the exception of the above errors and differences, there was a small warm bias in comparison with the results of assimilation by JMA at a depth of deeper than 200 m.


Figures

◊Station map ◊Vertical temperature profile

Vertical profile of temperature along the observing line of PX40 moved the entire profile by 5 degree Celsius.

station map water fall
◊Vertical observation sections ◊Summary of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth

Dots and error bars represent the averages and root mean squares of the differences, respectively. Crosses represent the maximum/minimum differences.

observation scatter plot (summary of all station)
◊Vertical sections for the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth
result of assimilation scatter plot(depth bases)
◊Vertical sections of differences (Obs. - Assim.) ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by temperature
differences (Obs. - Assim.) scatter plot (tempereture basis)