MAERSK NEW ORLEANS(ELZY3), PX09
Observation period : 2013/11/29 to 2013/12/10

This page shows results for the PX09 line based on monitoring by the MAERSK NEW ORLEANS and comparison with the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP.

Overall statistics

Number of profilesNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
223360420.130.906.33-6.63

Abbreviations in the table indicate:
AVE: average difference (observation value minus assimilation value)
RMSD: root mean square of difference
MAXD: maximum difference
MIND: minimum difference



Statistics for each depth range

Depth rangeNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
0-502750-0.100.950.63-2.51
50-1002743-0.281.672.56-6.63
100-1502725-0.001.975.33-6.33
150-20027250.141.036.33-6.32
200-25027250.220.545.31-2.56
250-30027250.190.372.91-2.21
300-35027250.130.311.57-1.36
350-40027250.110.311.28-0.68
400-45027250.130.341.32-0.93
450-50027250.180.251.35-1.01
500-55010900.250.401.99-0.82
550-60010900.280.422.55-0.67
600-65010900.280.462.96-0.51
650-70010900.260.513.27-0.45
700-75010900.250.553.52-0.46
750-80010900.250.593.72-0.45
800-85010820.270.623.91-0.42
850-9009350.310.674.08-0.36
900-9501401.231.244.23-0.09
950-1000483.240.204.382.42


Results of QC

A total of 223 profiles (99358 data, reported by BATHY or TESAC) were received from the MAERSK NEW ORLEANS.
The results of JMA quality control are as follows.
  • Grounded test
  • Error data: 190 of 99358

  • Position on land test
  • On land: 0 of 223

    Invalid position: 0 of 223

  • Regional range test
  • Error data (low): 0 of 99358

    Error data (high): 0 of 99358

  • Gradient test
  • Error data: 51 of 99358

For datails of JMA's quality control procedures, please refer to this page.


Summary of QC

  • Some erroneous profiles are detected by JMA's automated quality control procedures. These are checked by the grounded test and the gradient test. The main cause will be "hitting bottom" of XBT.
  • Among the data that passed JMA's automated quality control procedures, some "hitting bottom" data are found in the seas around Hawaiian Islands.(Refer to concerned figures) The topography used our grounded test is too rough to catch the error.
  • There are large differences at depths of between 100 and 200m in the seas south from 20°N. The observation data shows sharper thermocline better than the assimilation data.
  • With the exception of the above errors and differences, there were no significant biases in comparison with the results of assimilation by JMA.


Figures

◊Station map ◊Vertical temperature profile

Vertical profile of temperature along the observing line of PX09 moved the entire profile by 5 degree Celsius.

station map water fall
◊Vertical observation sections ◊Summary of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth

Dots and error bars represent the averages and root mean squares of the differences, respectively. Crosses represent the maximum/minimum differences.

observation scatter plot (summary of all station)
◊Vertical sections for the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth
result of assimilation scatter plot(depth bases)
◊Vertical sections of differences (Obs. - Assim.) ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by temperature
differences (Obs. - Assim.) scatter plot (tempereture basis)