MELL SPRINGWOOD(V2FE8), PX44
Observation period : 2014/9/20 to 2014/9/26

This page shows results for the PX44 line based on monitoring by the MELL SPRINGWOOD and comparison with the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP.

Overall statistics

Number of profilesNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
135380930.341.7618.59-17.11

Abbreviations in the table indicate:
AVE: average difference (observation value minus assimilation value)
RMSD: root mean square of difference
MAXD: maximum difference
MIND: minimum difference



Statistics for each depth range

Depth rangeNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
0-503343-0.301.392.35-5.46
50-1003108-0.221.612.50-14.52
100-1502953-0.111.135.19-17.11
150-20029250.091.257.06-4.66
200-25029020.281.388.77-2.21
250-30029000.501.6310.34-1.97
300-35029000.672.0311.91-1.74
350-40028280.802.3813.66-2.51
400-45028000.842.6914.83-2.14
450-50027680.891.9016.25-1.93
500-55010800.993.2817.50-1.42
550-60010780.991.5718.48-1.02
600-65010240.290.4118.59-1.01
650-7009980.110.362.29-0.90
700-7509800.060.351.61-0.96
750-8009800.110.352.25-0.83
800-8509800.180.382.92-0.70
850-9009800.220.403.43-0.38
900-9505110.310.573.74-0.21
950-1000501.620.414.030.54


Results of QC

A total of 135 profiles (61680 data, reported by BATHY or TESAC) were received from the MELL SPRINGWOOD.
The results of JMA quality control are as follows.
  • Grounded test
  • Error data: 6013 of 61680

  • Position on land test
  • On land: 0 of 135

    Invalid position: 0 of 135

  • Regional range test
  • Error data (low): 0 of 61680

    Error data (high): 600 of 61680

  • Gradient test
  • Error data: 315 of 61680

For datails of JMA's quality control procedures, please refer to this page.


Summary of QC

  • Some erroneous profiles are detected by JMA's automated quality control procedures. These are checked by the grounded test, the regional range test and the gradient test, but the true cause will be, "hitting bottom" or "exceeding the guaranteed depth of observation" of XBT.
  • Among the data that passed JMA's automated quality control procedures, some "hitting bottom" data are found in the seas around Taiwan (Refer to concerned figures) and adjacent the Ryukyu Chain (Refer to concerned figures). The topography used our grounded test is too rough to catch the error.
  • One of the observations at around 129°E is considered to be erroneous data.
  • With the exception of the above errors, there was no significant bias in comparison with the results of assimilation by JMA.


Figures

◊Station map ◊Vertical temperature profile

Vertical profile of temperature along the observing line of PX44 moved the entire profile by 5 degree Celsius.

station map water fall
◊Vertical observation sections ◊Summary of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth

Dots and error bars represent the averages and root mean squares of the differences, respectively. Crosses represent the maximum/minimum differences.

observation scatter plot (summary of all station)
◊Vertical sections for the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth
result of assimilation scatter plot(depth bases)
◊Vertical sections of differences (Obs. - Assim.) ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by temperature
differences (Obs. - Assim.) scatter plot (tempereture basis)