E.R. WILHELMSHAVEN(ELZY3), PX09
Observation period : 2015/5/11 to 2015/5/22

This page shows results for the PX09 line based on monitoring by the E.R. WILHELMSHAVEN and comparison with the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP.

Overall statistics

Number of profilesNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
21934013-0.050.694.18-6.45

Abbreviations in the table indicate:
AVE: average difference (observation value minus assimilation value)
RMSD: root mean square of difference
MAXD: maximum difference
MIND: minimum difference



Statistics for each depth range

Depth rangeNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
0-5026000.121.320.81-4.35
50-1002600-0.341.073.14-6.45
100-1502600-0.261.143.56-4.96
150-2002600-0.260.943.93-3.62
200-2502600-0.140.674.05-3.17
250-3002591-0.030.354.18-2.64
300-3502575-0.010.301.02-1.48
350-4002575-0.030.330.60-1.16
400-4502575-0.020.360.74-1.20
450-50025750.060.220.88-1.08
500-55010300.060.301.04-0.93
550-60010300.040.281.11-0.82
600-65010300.060.251.21-0.71
650-70010300.060.231.00-0.64
700-75010300.070.221.13-0.55
750-80010300.070.211.22-0.44
800-85010300.070.161.41-0.40
850-9008320.070.061.14-0.34
900-950800.150.000.85-0.19
950-10000----


Results of QC

A total of 219 profiles (100364 data, reported by BATHY or TESAC) were received from the E.R. WILHELMSHAVEN.
The results of JMA quality control are as follows.
  • Grounded test
  • Error data: 234 of 100364

  • Position on land test
  • On land: 0 of 219

    Invalid position: 0 of 219

  • Regional range test
  • Error data (low): 0 of 100364

    Error data (high): 8 of 100364

  • Gradient test
  • Error data: 55 of 100364

For datails of JMA's quality control procedures, please refer to this page.


Summary of QC

  • Some erroneous profiles are detected by JMA's automated quality control procedures. These are checked by the grounded test, regional range test and the gradient test. The main cause will be "hitting bottom" of XBT.
  • There are large differences at depths of between 100 and 200m. The observation data shows sharper thermocline better than the assimilation data.
  • With the exception of the above errors and differences, there were no significant biases in comparison with the results of assimilation by JMA.


Figures

◊Station map ◊Vertical temperature profile

Vertical profile of temperature along the observing line of PX09 moved the entire profile by 5 degree Celsius.

station map water fall
◊Vertical observation sections ◊Summary of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth

Dots and error bars represent the averages and root mean squares of the differences, respectively. Crosses represent the maximum/minimum differences.

observation scatter plot (summary of all station)
◊Vertical sections for the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth
result of assimilation scatter plot(depth bases)
◊Vertical sections of differences (Obs. - Assim.) ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by temperature
differences (Obs. - Assim.) scatter plot (tempereture basis)