HORIZON SPIRIT(WFLG), PX37
Observation period : 2016/1/20 to 2016/1/25

This page shows results for the PX37 line based on monitoring by the HORIZON SPIRIT and comparison with the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP.

Overall statistics

Number of profilesNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
10032187-0.040.624.52-3.54

Abbreviations in the table indicate:
AVE: average difference (observation value minus assimilation value)
RMSD: root mean square of difference
MAXD: maximum difference
MIND: minimum difference



Statistics for each depth range

Depth rangeNumber of dataAVERMSDMAXDMIND
0-502500-0.010.361.24-2.65
50-1002500-0.180.642.88-2.84
100-1502500-0.450.922.95-3.24
150-2002500-0.380.882.58-3.54
200-2502500-0.210.641.40-3.13
250-3002500-0.060.511.37-2.33
300-35025000.060.451.82-1.65
350-40025000.110.432.08-0.91
400-45024910.120.442.16-0.76
450-50024250.090.392.07-0.75
500-5509700.080.382.55-1.01
550-6009610.100.382.90-0.66
600-6509600.130.453.23-0.39
650-7009510.150.493.54-0.30
700-7509400.150.523.76-0.31
750-8009000.160.574.09-0.30
800-8509000.170.594.24-0.25
850-9006390.210.754.44-2.96
900-950442.061.424.52-0.15
950-100062.300.913.591.56


Results of QC

A total of 100 profiles (43955 data, reported by BATHY or TESAC) were received from the HORIZON SPIRIT.
The results of JMA quality control are as follows.
  • Grounded test
  • Error data: 0 of 43955

  • Position on land test
  • On land: 0 of 100

    Invalid position: 0 of 100

  • Regional range test
  • Error data (low): 0 of 43955

    Error data (high): 2 of 43955

  • Gradient test
  • Error data: 16 of 43955

For details of JMA's quality control procedures, please refer to this page.


Summary of QC

  • Some erroneous profiles are detected by JMA's automated quality control procedures. This is checked by the regional range test and the gradient test. The main cause will be "hitting bottom" of XBT.
  • Among the data that passed JMA's automated quality control procedures, some "hitting bottom" data are found in the seas near the west coast of the United States(Refer to concerned figures) and adjacent Hawaii Islands(Refer to concerned figures). The topography used our grounded test is too rough to catch the error.
  • There were differences above 2°C between observation data and the results of assimilation at depths of between 50 and 250m in the seas east of 138°W.
  • With the exception of the above errors, there were no significant biases in comparison with the results of assimilation by JMA.


Figures

◊Station map ◊Vertical temperature profile

Vertical profile of temperature along the observing line of PX37 moved the entire profile by 5 degree Celsius.

station map water fall
◊Vertical observation sections ◊Summary of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth

Dots and error bars represent the averages and root mean squares of the differences, respectively. Crosses represent the maximum/minimum differences.

observation scatter plot (summary of all station)
◊Vertical sections for the result of assimilation by MOVE-NP ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by depth
result of assimilation scatter plot(depth bases)
◊Vertical sections of differences (Obs. - Assim.) ◊Distribution of differences (Obs. - Assim.) by temperature
differences (Obs. - Assim.) scatter plot (tempereture basis)